![]()
Friday, July 6, 2007 A
"Fragile Beauties"
Anyway, this further encourages awakening at night to enjoy the peaceful coolness. I took note of the Photo Friday topic, 'busy', and got busy looking at my trip photos. Before I got much further in that, I found many photos I haven't already shared. These fragile beauties, seen our first day at the Freer museum, are from Syria, 1350 to 1400 century: |

| "Monumental in scale and exquisitely decorated, this deep bowl is characteristic of the finest glass production in late-fourteenth-century Syria. Its decorative frieze of fantastic animals- two griffins, two sphinxes, a lion, and three unicorns- is punctuated with the blazons of the Rasulid rulers of Yemen (1228-1454), identifying them once again as patrons of this vessel. In addition to its impressive size and sophisticated design, the bowl is remarkable for its enameling on both the exterior and interior surfaces." |
|
I wonder if the artisan broke any before finishing these? We don't know his (or her!) name, but we do know the name of the artisan who designed these more recent fragile beauties: (another artisan may have executed the designs, for he employed 300 workers in his factory)
|

| Yes, his father was the one who began the famous "Tiffany's", whose sparkly wares so many long to own. |

Friday, July 6, 2007 B
"Busy Place"
8:56pm
National Natural History Museum in Washington, D.C.!
|
This is my selection for the 'BUSY' Photo Friday topic! Few places are busier, except Walmart the night before Christmas!
![]()
Saturday, July 7, 2007
"Ratatouille"
Oh, "Ratatouille" is a sheer delight! We adored it. Rémy the rat with ambitions to become a chef won our hearts. The animation is extraordinary. Even the smallest details have been lovingly crafted. For instance, "the filmmakers created over 270 pieces of food in the computer. Every food item was prepared and styled in a real kitchen, then photographed for reference and eaten." (according to the movie website) I can't help but wonder if the film creators weren't inspired by our earliest mammal ancestor, "Morgie": |
|
|
|
Rémy the rat tells his brother he doesn't want to just be a rat, he wants to evolve into a creature beyond the basic rat instincts. And so he does. Going back to that first rat-like mammal, most of the fossil remains of the 'Morgies' are in Wales and in the Yunnan Province in China. There's abundent examples, but there are no complete skeltons. The artist who created the model had to work with the paleobiologist:
"Staab fashioned a skeleton from clay. Next, just as in a forensic reconstruction, he layered clay muscles over the bones, then added clay "skin" and sculpted it to look like fur. After Staab sent pictures of his Morgie off to the Smithsonian, Behrensmeyer asked him to make the head a bit bigger to reflect a large brain in relation to body size, one of the defining characteristics of mammals. She also recommended that Staab enlarge Morgie's eyes, because Morganucodon probably was nocturnal and needed highly sensitive eyes for effective hunting. And she asked him to add hair to the tail.
After a bit more back and forth, the clay model finally satisfied both artist and scientist."
I enjoyed Googling about Morgie and Rémy, and had lots of fun learning things about both. I discovered there is even a trailer for the movie with Japanese subtitles:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Monday, July 9, 2007 A
"View from Museum Porch - Colored"
![]()
Monday, July 9, 2007 B
"View from Museum Porch - Prints"
I know right where I'll put my print when it arrives. I've got a 16x20 frame that is being occupied by an earlier picture, the 'Vampire family portrait'. I'll take that drawing out, replace it with the new print, and put the nail higher up to accommodate the taller picture. I have to do that now. I've got so much of the walls covered, one has to come down to make room for the new one. 'Vampire family portrait' has been up for four and a half years, so it's had a good long showing. I'll put "View from the Museum Porch" in my "Favorites" gallery tomorrow.
![]()
Tuesday, July 10, 2007
"The Radiance is in the Moment"
![]()
![]()
Saturday, July 14, 2007 A
"The Two Powers Reconciled"
In reading TeVelde, I find, "Weill 2) characterised the myth of Horus and Seth as 'l'histoire
de deux dieux primordialement égaux, rivaux et concurrents,
complémentaires et nécessaires à l'équilibre du monde.'" My French along with some online translating help is good enough to read "the history of two Gods essentially equals, rivals and competitors, complementary and necessary to the balance of the world." Horus and Seth are called 'The Two Comrades'. In the Book of the Dead, the deceased becomes as all the gods, and becomes as Thoth, who:
"filled out (27)the Sound Eye after its crushing on that day when the Two Comrades fought. What does that mean? It
means the day when Horus fought Seth, when he (28)injured the face of Horus and Horus snatched away Seth's testicles."
Further on in that same book, there is similarily:
"Another spell. To be said (27)by Osiris N.: I am Thoth; (31)I judged between the Two Comrades. (33)I did away with their
fighting; I put an end to their laments." This Book of the Dead gives clues to the Two being 'complementary and necessary':
"(25)(If) Horus becomes pure, Seth becomes divine, and vice versa." In a different version of the Book of the Dead, again we see:
"(if) Horus becomes pure, Seth becomes divine, and vice versa." The Coffin texts are older than the Books (SCROLLS) of the Dead, as the texts were placed on the inside of the coffin so the mummy's Ka and Ba could read them. They read and declare:
"My (132)spine is (155)the Twin Souls." TeVelde explains the 'twin souls':
![]() Fig. 10. Horus and Seth united as "he with the two faces" [SGoC, page 69]
"In the Shabaka text the
uniting (sm3) and the reconciling (htp) of Horus and Seth are spoken
of in the same breath. 4) In BD 17 5) the dead says: Most of the Egyptian commentators explain this compound figure as an amalgamation of Osiris and Re. 6) One commentator, however, does not explain this compound figure as Osiris and Re, but as Horus and Seth: "Those are the ba of Horus and the ba of Seth, when he came to Letopolis. Finally they embraced one another and became He with the two ba's." 7)
Here too the uniting of two opposites into a totality seems to be
meant. Kees 8) called the two-headed Horus-Seth figure the union
of the forces of the two gods and De Buck 9) a kind of Janus figure.
According to him it stems from the impulse to see totality as a
unity of two inimical and yet collaborating opposites." Ideally, the 'two rivals' are be in balance. I find this from that same Coffin text very interesting: "My (98)eyes are (113)the God of Magic. My (99)ears are (114)the Great Hearer. My (100)eyebrows are (115)the Two Powers." Just who would that 'God of Magic' be? Could it be this united Seth-Horus? If one eye is the inward looking eye, that is of Set and one eye is the outward looking eye, that is of Horus, could thusly they united be this 'God of Magic'? Further hinting at this is the title for the eyebrows, 'the Two Powers'. The names of the Pharoahs Peribsen and Khasekhemui explain this, also: "The Horus name of a successor of Peribsen is Khasekhem (the power has appeared). It has been suggested that Khasekhem is identical with Khasekhemui (the two powers have appeared). If that is indeed the case, 2) then we should have a development reminiscent of Sekhemib taking the Seth name Peribsen. Over the serekh in which Khasekhemui is written, however, the Seth-animal does not appear alone, but in company with the Horus falcon. The name Khasekhemui is sometimes supplemented (the two lords who are in him, are reconciled). [SGoC, page 73] Now I wonder who 'the Great Hearer' is? Know any Gods famous for big ears? (Big, tall, squared off ears, maybe?) |
Forward...
Go Back to Archives...
Go Back to Main Journal Index Page...
Go to Index of Joan's pages...
![]()
© Joan Lansberry