Friday, April 11, 2008 B

"Encore Courbet"
6:48pm

While I perused the Smithsonian magazine over lunch, I again came across the Courbet photo I really wanted to draw:

He is much more dynamic in this pose. So I brought the magazine home and scanned, as you can see, and sketched:


72 dpi underneath...

As I looked at my pen and ink drawing, I 'saw' the vest as red, and had to make it so. From there, I gave him reddish hair to further enhance my attempt at his virile visage.

When I was searching for more info on Courbet, I found his letter "To the young artists of Paris, Paris, December 25, 1861", and took note of his advice:

"Every age should be represented only by its own artists, that is to say, by the artists who have lived in it. I hold that the artists of one century are totally incapable of representing the things of a preceding or subsequent century, in other words, of painting the past or the future. It is in this sense that I deny the possibility of historical art applied to the past. Historical art is by nature contempory. Every age must have its artists, who give expression to it and reproduce it for the future. An age that has not managed to find expression in the work of its own artists has no right to be expressed by later artists. That would be falsifying history.

The history of an age finishes with the age itself and with those of its representatives who expressed it. It is not the task of later times to add something to the expression of previous times - to aggrandize or embellish the past. What has been has been. The human mind has the duty always to begin working afresh, always in the present, building on results already obtained. One must never begin something anew but always proceed from synthesis to synthesis, from conclusion to conclusion.

The true artists are those who pick up their age exactly at the point to which it has been carried by previous times. To go backward is to do nothing, to waste effort, to have neither understood nor profited from the lessons of the past. That explains why antiquated schools of all kinds always end up producing the most useless compilations."
(pages 203-204, _Letters of Gustave Courbet By Gustave Courbet_, Petra ten-Doesschate Chu)

I think what he is saying there is to study the past, learn from it, but do not try to make an exact duplicate of it. Synthesize it, all your various observations of it, into something new.

Friday, April 12, 2008 A

"Many Weird Dreams"
6:17am

I've been having such weird and vivid dreams. Today's was too weird for public revelation (having to do with odd jokes and such), but here's the one I had yesterday:

I spoke of it to Julia, as I didn't have time to write it down, so now I am remembering it as best I can. I was on a school bus, going to college. Laura was also on the bus. We were having a discussion at the back of the bus, with some other people. A question was being debated. "Is it necessary to understand the full symbolism of Middle Eastern/Egyptian dance to be able to appreciate it as an observer?" I answered, "The dancer is communicating wordlessly her heart, which the audience will receive in the place of knowing without words, so yes!"

Laura and I shared some private words after that, but I can't remember exactly what, except that it felt all of a smile and an embrace from her Ka and Ba in the beyond.

Friday, April 12, 2008 B

"Ma'at and Me"
10:40am

I've done it, opened up the book and sketched Ma'at:


Ma'at in Nefertari's tomb, from _The Royal Tombs of Egypt: The Art of Thebes Revealed_, photos by Sandro Vannini, page 85

I remembered with amusement Courbet's words on copying 'the past' directly, so I did not duplicate the hands as they are in the original. Perhaps there is some additional significance to the unrealistic hand positions, I should study the symbology books more. But I didn't want her hands like that. Also, I gave her a smile, and put my own name, along with 'Beloved of Set' in the cartouche.

I wanted some writing in the background as the original has, so I found some phrases:


"He shall come forth by day", from Budge's _The Egyptian Book of the Dead_


Hieroglyph for "night", _Gereh_

I'd got the picture all drawn. I invited Julia to have a look. She exclaimed, "Oh, I wish you had called me over before you inked it in. The gender is all wrong! You should use the feminine!" So we found in another Budge book the gender determinatives:


The 'viper' is masculine determinative, the 'bolt' is feminine determinative...

I joked a bit, but then thought, well, I should have it right. But, oh, to redraw it! But I found a solution. Laura had bought a glass table for doing her cartoons. The light she used to aid tracing was still there, and still plugged in. That light illuminates so well, I can trace on thick bristol board from a sheet of thick bristol board underneath. I took advantage to make better placement of the figures overall, give Ma'at a nicer face, and elongate her too short waist.


Ma'at herself is making a hieroglyph for 'love' with her arm positions and the enclosure of the cartouche!
If an attempt at handcoloring it goes wrong, I can always do digital.
Also, I have the original with the masculine gender determinative to trace again, and re-color. Options!

Sunday, April 13, 2008 A

"Whistler - Line Drawing"
9:46am

I'm not really one to finish something before I start something else, oh no, that's not me. So I did my Ma'at line drawing, and did some more work on the gallery of ancient Set images, finish, no! And off I am this morning, having started something new. Well, really, the germ seed of the idea began earlier. I put the Courbet drawing in the portrait gallery. Well there, I saw the pitiful drawing of James McNeill Whistler I'd done. There's some connection between these two artists, as the Smithsonian article writer reveals:

"The young James Whistler, recently arrived from the United States to study art in Paris, told an artist friend that Courbet was his new hero, announcing, "C'est un grand homme!" ("He is a great man!")."

Having done a passable Courbet, I had to do something better with his colleague. I vowed then to do something about it. I found a reasonable image to work with, and made a screen capture. Then I got involved in other things, while the capture waited.

This morning, the CBS Sunday morning show featured an artist who says he 'channels' the spirits of President Lincoln and others when he paints them. Hmmm, says I! So I pulled up my screen capture, enlarged it hugely, and said in low tones, "Ka of Whistler, come to me!" I'm not sure his Ka bothered. His Ka may be on some other incarnation, and really rather busy this morning. But as I looked at the photo, I could get a sense of a man almost arrogant in his determination to do things as he saw fit.

Indeed, as we examine his history, Whistler was well acquainted with _The Gentle Art of Making Enemies_! He regarded John Ruskin, a prominent art critic, as an 'enemy' for the inflammatory things he said:

"For Mr. Whistler's own sake, no less than for the protection of the purchaser, Sir Coutts Lindsay ought not to have admitted works into the gallery in which the ill-educated conceit of the artist so nearly approached the aspect of willful imposture. I have seen, and heard, much of cockney impudence before now; but never have expected to hear a coxcomb ask two hundred guineas (Whistler's asking price for the painting) for flinging a pot of paint in the public's face."

Well, Whistler wasn't going to just let him say that without much reaction. He sued him. He won the suit, but bankrupted himself in the process.

In his "Ten O'Clock Lecture" in London, 1885, he explained his aesthetics:

"Nature contains the elements, in colour and form, of all pictures, as the keyboard contains the notes of all music. But the artist is born to pick, and choose, and group with science, these elements, that the result may be beautiful as the musician gathers his notes. And forms his chords, until he brings forth from chaos glorious harmony."

I am ever trying for that harmony, no doubt much more progress to be made before it ever becomes 'glorious'. But I think I can say I am making progress:


Oh, yes, this needs coloring...


...Detail...

Sunday, April 13, 2008 B

"Broke 100 Degrees"
7:24pm

It's a thing I usually note every year, when Yuma breaks into the triple digits. Ooh, yes, we did today, 102°F, 38°C. I got a bit woozy earlier, and my tummy is still a bit off. However, I thank all responsible beings for air conditioning. Also, Julia made some delicious mint tea from some mint leaves a friend gave us. I've been sipping that all afternoon and evening.

Monday, April 14, 2008

"Flowers For Laura"
6:33am

Laura always wanted to be remembered on her birthday with flowers, in particular roses. I have been thinking of her a lot this morning, remembering our days together.

Last year, I had an actual rose. Today, no roses, but beautiful blooms just the same:


This is a bloom from Tucson Botanical Garden, I did not catch what kind...


This is a Phalaenopsis orchid, which won a blue ribbon at the fair, grown by Judy Vine

I wonder if her name 'Vine', encouraged her to garden pursuits. It's certainly appropriate.

Meanwhile back to remembering Laura, and our days together...

For a moment these things, and then a shifting of the sand, the sand which hides things to be found again another day, under an older sun, in a different light.

For _that day_, _that sun_, _those moments_, I seal this and to those days, which will have their rememberances in still later lives...

For _that day_, a kiss, for those days gone by, a kiss, and for all the magic we shared, a kiss....

To the mysteries...
and the sand...
and to days to come...

In this moment now,
I thank you Laura,
it was one hell of a ride,
and you took me places no one else could...
and I thank you...

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

"Treasures of Karnak"
6:42am

Last night, I sniffed some orangish red roses on way to enter Julia's work, and said, "I'm sniffing these for you, Laura!" So fragrant roses she got, as best she could, sans corporeal.

Later, I spent enjoyable time catching up on various Egyptology blogs. I came across info regarding an exhibit in France, “Trésors d’Égypte” . If you click on "Vues de l'expo", you get some idea of how the exhibit looked in the wide eye view. But Andie of Egyptology.blogspot.com has photos of individual pieces here, here and here. (Click on her small versions to see full size.) She gives a description:

"Photographs from the 2004/2005 exhibition Trésors d'Egypte - La cachette de Karnak which was held at the Musée Dauphinois in Grenoble, France. 22 of the statues from the remarkable Karnak Cachette were displayed in the former seventeenth century convent. The remarkable collection of statues was found in a courtyard of the Temple of Amun at Karnak. They date from the Old Kingdom through to the Ptolemaic period. Several hundred complete statues and fragments were found between 1903 and 1905 by George Legrain, and they represent the single largest collection of statues ever found in Egypt."

They are gorgeous, but there is nothing to identify who they represented. An exhibition catalogue can be downloaded for 45 euros. I don't know how much that it, but I think it's expensive, and the text is in French. My school French is enough to let me pick up about half of the meaning. I do wish this show would come to a museum _I_ could visit. Meanwhile, we have these photos to enjoy.

I made screen capture of one that particularily amuses me. He looks like he's standing behind a podium, giving a lecture. I wonder who he is, he has a bit of the rounded face of one of the sons of Ramses II, Khaemwaset, also known as Setne Khamuast. It would be appropriate for 'the first Egyptologist' to appear as if he were giving a lecture:


Who ever he is, he looks like he's giving a lecture...

7:28pm

I may be right on my idea this statue is Khaemwaset, for I came across another reference to this exhibit, this time showing in the Cairo Museum:

"Among the most significant items on display are a fine limestone statue of Psammetik I, founder of the 26th dynasty, in the shape of a sphinx; a dark gray diorite statue of Shapenoupet II, daughter of the 25th- dynasty Pharaoh Piankhi, in the shape of a female sphinx holding a bust of a bull; a white limestone statuette of Amun's musician Taheret with curly hair; and a yellow quartzite statue of the high priest of Memphis, Khaemouset, son of Ramses II."

Yes, Khaemwaset was there in Memphis:

"In his long reign, Ramesses II (1279-1213 BC) had many sons by a number of different wives. The best-known of these is almost certainly his fourth son Khaemwaset, who has left many traces of his activities in Egypt. Early in his life, Khaemwaset was attached to the cult service of Ptah, the god of Memphis. Khaemwaset spent most of the rest of his life in the Memphite region. He is renowned as perhaps being the 'first Egyptologist', as he left large inscriptions telling of his visits to clear and renew parts of the pyramids of Giza and Saqqara. He was also responsible for work on the burial places of the Apis bulls at Saqqara, and may even have been buried there himself. In later times Khaemwaset was recalled as a magician."

Because of the fushia lighting, I can't tell if the statue is yellow quartzite. I, did however, find another site with Karnak Cachette info. No Khaemwaset there in those photo selections, but then this does not disprove my theory that statue is him. I still could be right. I'll keep looking.

8:25pm

I found at Wikipedia a photo of a statue head of Khaemwaset which VERY MUCH resembles the face in the Karnak cachette!

Note of April 17, 2008:
I have received confirmation, this is DEFINITELY Khaemwaset. This statue is normally at the Cairo museum, JE 36720. Thank you, fellow lover of the ancient mysteries...
A little look at the Cairo museum, and yes, I found a tiny photo of this nice statue! (JE 36720,CG 42147)

Thursday, April 17, 2008

"'Come Sail Away' With Music"
6:48am


Vaguely how my piano at Gramma's house looked...

I was asked in one of my forums about my early experiences with music.The first music I remember hearing is my mom playing the piano and my dad playing the guitar. They sung oldies nobody remembers anymore, old classics like "Love Makes the World Go Round", "Yellow Bird", and some still heard, like "Autumn Leaves". There's something special about music like that, rather than off the radio or CD. (Back then, it was LPs.) It was comforting to hear them play, like everything was all right in the world. I'd whirl and swirl to it. (I was like five then.)

When I got older, they didn't play together like that, and it was a subtle sign not everything was right in the world. They divorced when I was twelve.

I took piano lessons, and although I didn't do much with the lessons, I enjoyed playing the pop stuff. I'm sure I played "If You Could Read My Mind" by Gordon Lightfoot enough times to drive my gramma nuts. But now, as I recall, I think it was a sad song to express the things that my heart felt:

"When you reach the part where the heartaches come
The hero would be me
But heroes often fail
And you won't read that book again
Because the ending's just too hard to take..."

That ending, the divorce, affected me in ways I would only consciously understand much later. There was other weird things I was dealing with at fourteen. Maybe _I_ was the "ghost from a wishin' well", who was just beginning to experience things that Gramma and Dad could never understand. (Doubts of their religion, for one thing.) But it wasn't just sad songs. I loved the Carpenter's music and had all their cassettes and all their songbooks. I'd play those happy songs, 'On Top of the World', 'We've Only Just Begun' and others. I love a lot of that music from the seventies, Cat Stevens, Queen, Styx, good stuff, that...

I remember playing "Come Sail Away", "This song of hope" by Styx:

I'm sailing away, set an open course for the virgin sea
I've got to be free, free to face the life that's ahead of me
On board, I'm the captain, so climb aboard
We'll search for tomorrow on every shore
And I'll try, oh lord, I'll try to carry on

I did more than 'just try', I did carry on, and music was such an important part in that.

Forward...
Go Back to Archives...
Go Back to Main Journal Index Page...
Go to Index of Joan's pages...


© Joan Lansberry